A FACTORY worker has been found not guilty of causing the death of a colleague and friend by driving dangerously after they had enjoyed “banter” about him cycling to work for the first time.
Gareth Robbins has admitted causing the death of Paul Heenan by careless driving after they had just finished their shift at battery manufacturer Yuasa in Ebbw Vale.
He had been on trial for the more serious charge of causing the 40-year-old father-of-two’s death by dangerous driving on Friday, April 11, 2020.
Robbins was accused of accelerating his car after allegedly towing the cyclist along after it was claimed Mr Heenan had grabbed on to his Peugeot 208.
The prosecution also put it to the jury the defendant drove too close to him, had shouted out at him and taken his eyes off the road by doing so.
MORE NEWS: Dangerous driver reached speeds of 100mph during dramatic police chase on M4
A jury unanimously cleared him of causing death by dangerous driving.
Defendant Gareth Robbins was described during the trial as a “very kind, caring and sensitive person”
Robbins, 33, of Clos Gwaith Dur, Ebbw Vale, is due to be sentenced following his guilty plea on Monday to causing Mr Heenan’s death by carless driving.
Judge Christopher Vosper QC adjourned the case until May for the preparation of a pre-sentence report and granted the defendant unconditional bail.
Mr Heenan, from Abertysswg, Caerphilly, fell off his bicycle and died after suffering “catastrophic injuries”.
Paul Heenan, 40, from Abertysswg, Caerphilly was described as "extremely well-liked". Picture: Family handout/Gwent Police
A Cardiff Crown Court jury heard how the defendant and other workmates had “ripped” into the deceased that day because he had cycled to work.
Giving his evidence-in-chief, Robbins said he had worked alongside Mr Heenan who he referred to by the nicknames “Skipper and Guvnor”.
The court was told Robbins was a married father-of-one who had never previously been in trouble with the police.
Jurors heard that the defendant was a former cook with Wetherspoons who started working at Yuasa in 2010.
He told his barrister Clare Wilks he had a “really good” working relationship with Mr Heenan and added, “I’d like to think we were more than colleagues”.
The victim would always travel to work in his car but on the day of his death he had rode in on his bike.
Robbins said: “We have never known Paul to cycle into work.”
The jury heard there was “banter” between Mr Heenan and colleagues about that and how gyms were closed during the time because of the first coronavirus lockdown.
“There was jesting about him cycling in because of the gyms, yes,” Robbins said.
Asked about what happened as they left work, the defendant said: “He (Mr Heenan) was just cycling slow in front of me on the narrow road.
“I just thought he was joking about.
“As you come to the opening, widening of the road Paul was still cycling in front of me so I tried to go around Paul to make my way out.
“Paul was weaving like an S-shape when the road opened up when I tried to overtake.”
In cross-examination, Robbins said he told Mr Heenan earlier that day: “Why are you cycling in? You’re too old to cycle in. It was just laughing amongst friends kind of thing.”
Prosecutor Eugene Egan asked him: “There’s no suggestion it was menacing?
"It was all perfectly good-natured and taken in good spirit all round?”
Robbins replied: “Oh yeah, yeah.”
Mr Egan questioned him: “Was he answering back, saying I’m fit enough and things like that?
"It was a two-way conversation? It was workplace banter?
The defendant answered that it was.
The jury heard how Mr Heenan was “slowing traffic down” behind him after riding along on the Rassau Industrial Estate at around 6pm.
“So Paul was deliberately weaving and stopping cars from overtaking him wasn’t he?
"Cars are beeping at him but that wasn’t in a menacing way was it?” Mr Egan asked.
Robbins agreed.
“Both sides were engaging in a bit of fun weren’t they, Paul and the motorists behind him?
"It wasn’t beeping at a total stranger for driving right in front of them, it was just joking?”
The defendant again agreed.
Mr Egan told the jury: “Playful workplace banter had spilled over with tragic consequences.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel