PROTESTERS fighting a High Court battle to stop a mobile phone mast being sited in their village have been given a major boost.

People living in Talywain, near Pontypool are deeply concerned about health risks associated with mobile technology.

They say a government-commissioned report in 2000, by industry expert Sir William Stewart, urges a cautionary approach where children and vulnerable people are concerned.

Now Sir William has hit out at mobile companies, saying they are misinterpreting his report and failing to take that precautionary stance.

He is due to meet protesters in Norwich in November, and has said he is "sympathetic" to their views.

Kath Gullick of Communities Acting Together is leading the campaign in Talywain, along with community councillor Wayne Tomlinson.

She said: "The residents involved and ourselves are very encouraged to hear that the views of the public will finally be listened to and taken into account."

Papers have been served by solicitors acting for the protesters, in a bid to get Vodaphone's plans for a phone mast overturned.

"Sir William urged a cautionary approach, especially where young and vulnerable people were concerned - that clearly applies here," said Mr Tomlinson.

Vodaphone plans to put its mast on land belonging to Talywain Rugby Club, which houses a mother and toddlers group, as well as numerous sports activities for children.

People living in Emlyn Road and surrounding streets, close to the rugby club, say they were not notified.

Torfaen council has said it fulfilled its statutory duty by putting up notices, and Vodaphone claims there are no health risks involved.

"The jury is still out on whether peoples' health can be affected - if children are involved, we cannot take risks," said Mr Tomlinson.

During a recent speech, Sir William Stewart said the public had a right to demand "clear, understandable information".

In his report Sir William said masts should not be put near schools or areas used regularly by children.

He also said a risk to those suffering long-term illness could not be ruled out.